Android port of Radamsa vs Pupy: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Pupy is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teamers and penetration testers running structured assessments need Pupy for its genuine cross-platform reach and minimal operational footprint; the 8,948 GitHub stars reflect active community maintenance that keeps payloads functional across Windows, Linux, macOS, and Android without the licensing friction of commercial C2 frameworks. The tool's strength is flexibility and cost, not operational security or defensive evasion,modern EDR will catch it unless you're actively managing MITRE ATT&CK tradecraft. This is not for teams that need polished UI, enterprise support, or built-in OPSEC features; it's for practitioners who know how C2 infrastructure works and want to customize every layer themselves.
