Android port of Radamsa vs Macro_Pack: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Macro_Pack is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to rapidly generate obfuscated Office payloads without manual encoding will find Macro_Pack indispensable; the free cost and 2,300 GitHub stars reflect its adoption across professional assessments. The tool excels at shortening payload development cycles by automating VBA obfuscation techniques that would otherwise require custom scripting, making it particularly valuable for teams running multiple concurrent engagements. Skip this if your assessment scope excludes client-side Office exploitation or if your toolchain already includes mature payload generation frameworks; Macro_Pack solves one problem exceptionally well rather than replacing a full C2 platform.
