Android port of Radamsa vs Luyten: 2026 Comparison
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Luyten is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Penetration testers and red teamers who spend hours manually analyzing obfuscated Java bytecode will cut that time in half with Luyten's GUI-driven decompilation. The tool sits atop Procyon, a decompiler known for handling modern Java constructs that older tools like JD-GUI struggle with, and its 5,120 GitHub stars reflect sustained adoption among practitioners. Skip this if you need automated vulnerability scanning or integration with your existing pentest workflow; Luyten is a standalone decompiler for interactive reverse engineering, not a platform play.
