Android port of Radamsa vs JD-GUI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. JD-GUI is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Java developers and penetration testers who need to audit third-party compiled libraries or validate obfuscation effectiveness will get more from JD-GUI than commercial alternatives, since the graphical interface actually makes class file navigation faster than command-line decompilers when you're hunting for suspicious code patterns. With 15,050 GitHub stars and zero licensing friction, it's become the default in security shops doing Java reverse engineering; most teams already have it installed. Not the right tool if you're analyzing obfuscated bytecode at scale or need batch processing across thousands of JARs, where CFR or Procyon's CLI mode handles the workload more efficiently.
