Android port of Radamsa vs GraphSpy: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. GraphSpy is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teams and Azure-focused penetration testers will find GraphSpy invaluable for post-compromise Azure AD and Microsoft 365 testing because it operates entirely in-browser, leaving no agent footprint and avoiding the detection overhead of traditional tools. The 1,176 GitHub stars signal real adoption among practitioners who need quick token enumeration and service interaction without standing up infrastructure. Skip this if your team operates primarily on-premises or needs to test non-Microsoft cloud environments; GraphSpy's value collapses outside the Microsoft ecosystem.
