Android port of Radamsa vs getJS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. getJS is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters chasing JavaScript sources will appreciate getJS for its speed and simplicity; it does one job,surface all JS files from a target,and does it without the bloat of full-stack recon frameworks. With 822 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's proven reliable enough to become a standard in offensive workflows where reconnaissance must be fast and repeatable. Skip this if you need post-exploitation capabilities or OSINT depth; getJS is a knife, not a toolkit.
