Android port of Radamsa vs EvilClippy: 2026 Comparison
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. EvilClippy is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teamers and penetration testers validating macro-based attack chains will find EvilClippy indispensable; it generates weaponized Office documents with VBA obfuscation and sandbox evasion in minutes, cutting reconnaissance time on engagements where social engineering is the attack vector. The 2,235 GitHub stars and active maintenance across Windows, macOS, and Linux indicate it's the standard tool for this exact workflow. Skip it if your objective is testing detection tuning or EDR response; EvilClippy prioritizes payload delivery over post-compromise simulation, so teams hunting for evasion gaps will need to pair it with endpoint logging and monitoring separately.
