Android port of Radamsa vs Domain: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Domain is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Penetration testers and red team operators who need fast domain enumeration and reconnaissance will get the most from Domain. It's a stripped-down Recon-ng setup script that trades the framework's complexity for speed; 935 GitHub stars reflect adoption among practitioners who value quick, repeatable enumeration over interactive workflows. Skip this if your team needs guided engagement tracking, reporting automation, or integration with commercial pentest platforms; Domain is a command-line tool for operators who already know what data they're hunting.
