What is the difference between Anchore Enforce vs Anchore Secure?

**Anchore Enforce**: Policy enforcement & compliance mgmt for container security across SDLC. built by Anchore. Core capabilities include Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, DISA, and Docker CIS compliance, Runtime monitoring of Kubernetes clusters and namespaces, License management with copyleft detection.. **Anchore Secure**: Container & source code scanning for vulnerabilities, malware, and secrets. built by Anchore. Core capabilities include Container image vulnerability scanning, Source code scanning, SBOM generation using Syft.. Both serve the Container Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

What features do Anchore Enforce vs Anchore Secure offer?

**Anchore Enforce** differentiates with Pre-built policy packs for FedRAMP, NIST, DISA, and Docker CIS compliance, Runtime monitoring of Kubernetes clusters and namespaces, License management with copyleft detection. **Anchore Secure** differentiates with Container image vulnerability scanning, Source code scanning, SBOM generation using Syft.

Who makes Anchore Enforce vs Anchore Secure?

**Anchore Enforce** is developed by Anchore. **Anchore Secure** is developed by Anchore. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Anchore Enforce a good alternative to Anchore Secure?

Anchore Enforce and Anchore Secure serve similar Container Security use cases: both are Container Security tools, both cover SBOM, Software Supply Chain, Kubernetes. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.