Q: Is Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise a good alternative to Resec Gateway Security?

Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise and Resec Gateway Security serve similar Security Service Edge use cases: both are Security Service Edge tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Question 1

What is the difference between Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs Resec Gateway Security?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise**: Cloud-based DNS firewall protecting users and IoT devices from threats. built by Akamai. Core capabilities include Real-time threat intelligence blocking malicious domains and websites, DNS firewall inspection of all domain name system queries, Low-throughput DNS data exfiltration blocking..

**Resec Gateway Security**: Gateway security platform with CDR, file sanitization & threat prevention. built by resec. Core capabilities include Intelligent File Firewall for true file type identification, Antivirus Multi-Scanning Engine with multiple AV orchestration, Macro Scanning Engine for VB and JavaScript code..

Both serve the Security Service Edge market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Question 2

What features do Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs Resec Gateway Security offer?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise** differentiates with Real-time threat intelligence blocking malicious domains and websites, DNS firewall inspection of all domain name system queries, Low-throughput DNS data exfiltration blocking. **Resec Gateway Security** differentiates with Intelligent File Firewall for true file type identification, Antivirus Multi-Scanning Engine with multiple AV orchestration, Macro Scanning Engine for VB and JavaScript code.

Question 3

Who makes Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise vs Resec Gateway Security?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise** is developed by Akamai. **Resec Gateway Security** is developed by resec. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.