Question 1

What is the difference between Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Cato SSE 360?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Enterprise Application Access**: ZTNA solution providing identity-based access to private apps. Built by Akamai. headquartered in United States. core capabilities include Zero Trust Network Access as a service, Device posture assessment for adaptive access, Clientless web application access.

**Cato SSE 360**: Cloud-based SSE platform with SWG, CASB, DLP, and ZTNA capabilities. Built by Cato Networks. headquartered in Israel. core capabilities include Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Question 2

What features do Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Cato SSE 360 offer?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Enterprise Application Access** differentiates with Zero Trust Network Access as a service, Device posture assessment for adaptive access, Clientless web application access. **Cato SSE 360** differentiates with Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

Question 3

Who makes Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Cato SSE 360?

Accepted Answer

**Akamai Enterprise Application Access** is developed by Akamai. **Cato SSE 360** is developed by Cato Networks. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Question 4

Is Akamai Enterprise Application Access a good alternative to Cato SSE 360?

Accepted Answer

Akamai Enterprise Application Access and Cato SSE 360 serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both cover ZTNA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Cato SSE 360