AISI DFIR vs sslhaf: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AISI DFIR is a commercial digital forensics and incident response tool by AISI. sslhaf is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to move fast on active incidents will find AISI DFIR's managed service model cuts through the hiring shortage for in-house forensics expertise. The Scout and Hunter tools automate evidence collection and persistence removal directly on affected systems, compressing response timelines that would otherwise stretch weeks. The caveat: this is a managed service first, so your team trades hands-on control for speed and specialist depth, making it less suitable for organizations that need full visibility and control over every forensic decision.
Incident response teams investigating encrypted traffic on networks without decryption capability should deploy sslhaf for passive client fingerprinting during SSL/TLS handshakes; it surfaces device and application behavior that traditional network tools miss without requiring MITM proxies or key material. The tool is free and lightweight enough to run in constrained environments, making it particularly useful for rapid triage when you need to answer "what connected to what" in the first hour after detection. Skip this if your team already has proxy-based SSL inspection or if you need post-handshake payload analysis; sslhaf stops at the handshake and won't replace DPI tools for application-layer forensics.
