AISI DFIR vs Relativity Data Breach Response: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AISI DFIR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to move fast on active incidents will find AISI DFIR's managed service model cuts through the hiring shortage for in-house forensics expertise. The Scout and Hunter tools automate evidence collection and persistence removal directly on affected systems, compressing response timelines that would otherwise stretch weeks. The caveat: this is a managed service first, so your team trades hands-on control for speed and specialist depth, making it less suitable for organizations that need full visibility and control over every forensic decision.

Relativity Data Breach Response

Organizations managing data breach investigations at scale,particularly mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in document review,should pick Relativity Data Breach Response for its pre-trained AI models that identify PII and PHI without weeks of manual labeling. The 120+ models ship production-ready and improve through continued use, compressing the scope and notification timeline from months to weeks. Entity normalization is the real differentiator here; it catches duplicate records and duplicate notification sends that generic classifiers miss. Skip this if your breach is small enough that manual review feels manageable, or if you need forensic capabilities beyond data identification; Relativity's strength is narrowly in the identify-and-notify phase, not rootcause analysis.