AISI DFIR vs MFT Parsers Review: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AISI DFIR is a commercial digital forensics and incident response tool by AISI. MFT Parsers Review is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to move fast on active incidents will find AISI DFIR's managed service model cuts through the hiring shortage for in-house forensics expertise. The Scout and Hunter tools automate evidence collection and persistence removal directly on affected systems, compressing response timelines that would otherwise stretch weeks. The caveat: this is a managed service first, so your team trades hands-on control for speed and specialist depth, making it less suitable for organizations that need full visibility and control over every forensic decision.
Forensic analysts and incident responders who need to validate or compare NTFS timeline reconstruction methods should use MFT Parsers Review to audit parser accuracy before committing to a single tool in production. The review evaluates how different parsers handle edge cases in Master File Table extraction, inconsistencies that directly impact whether you catch timeline gaps during investigations. Skip this if your team has already standardized on a parser and has no budget for validation work; the review is reference material, not a parser itself.
