AISI DFIR vs Cyber Incident Response Playbook Battle Cards: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AISI DFIR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to move fast on active incidents will find AISI DFIR's managed service model cuts through the hiring shortage for in-house forensics expertise. The Scout and Hunter tools automate evidence collection and persistence removal directly on affected systems, compressing response timelines that would otherwise stretch weeks. The caveat: this is a managed service first, so your team trades hands-on control for speed and specialist depth, making it less suitable for organizations that need full visibility and control over every forensic decision.

Cyber Incident Response Playbook Battle Cards

Security teams without a formal incident response framework will find the most immediate value in Cyber Incident Response Playbook Battle Cards; the structured battle card format forces decision-making during the fog of an active incident rather than debating process mid-crisis. Free pricing and 424 GitHub stars indicate active community refinement and zero procurement friction for teams testing playbook discipline. Skip this if your organization already has validated, tabletop-tested runbooks embedded in your SOAR; these cards work best as a starting template, not a replacement for matured response procedures.