Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a commercial static application security testing tool by Aikido Security. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a free dynamic application security testing tool by Xygeni. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best static application security testing fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
Development teams at startups and SMBs who need SAST without the operational overhead will see immediate ROI from Aikido Static Application Security Testing; the AI-powered false positive filtering cuts the triage noise that kills adoption in resource-constrained shops, and pull request integration means developers catch issues in their workflow instead of in a separate tool. The 16-language coverage handles most polyglot codebases, and automated fix generation reduces the friction of pushing remediation back to engineers. Skip this if you're an enterprise with mature AppSec practices and heavy custom rule requirements; you'll want deeper customization and larger vendor support teams than Aikido's 187-person operation can sustain at scale. SMB and mid-market teams deploying infrastructure as code across multiple cloud providers will get the most from Xygeni IaC Security because it catches misconfigurations before they reach production by scanning templates directly in your CI/CD pipeline rather than after deployment. The tool integrates scanning across Git repositories, container registries, and file systems in a single policy engine, which means fewer tool sprawl headaches for lean security teams. Skip this if you need post-deployment remediation as your primary control; Xygeni is built for shift-left prevention, not forensics on live cloud infrastructure that's already running.
Based on our analysis of core features, integrations, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Development teams at startups and SMBs who need SAST without the operational overhead will see immediate ROI from Aikido Static Application Security Testing; the AI-powered false positive filtering cuts the triage noise that kills adoption in resource-constrained shops, and pull request integration means developers catch issues in their workflow instead of in a separate tool. The 16-language coverage handles most polyglot codebases, and automated fix generation reduces the friction of pushing remediation back to engineers. Skip this if you're an enterprise with mature AppSec practices and heavy custom rule requirements; you'll want deeper customization and larger vendor support teams than Aikido's 187-person operation can sustain at scale.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
SMB and mid-market teams deploying infrastructure as code across multiple cloud providers will get the most from Xygeni IaC Security because it catches misconfigurations before they reach production by scanning templates directly in your CI/CD pipeline rather than after deployment. The tool integrates scanning across Git repositories, container registries, and file systems in a single policy engine, which means fewer tool sprawl headaches for lean security teams. Skip this if you need post-deployment remediation as your primary control; Xygeni is built for shift-left prevention, not forensics on live cloud infrastructure that's already running.
SAST tool that identifies security and quality issues in source code
Runtime DAST simulating real attacks to find exploitable web and API risk
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPExplore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vs Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) for your static application security testing needs.
Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST): SAST tool that identifies security and quality issues in source code. built by Aikido Security..
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Runtime DAST simulating real attacks to find exploitable web and API risk. built by Xygeni..
Both serve the Static Application Security Testing market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is developed by Aikido Security. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is developed by Xygeni. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.
Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) serve similar Static Application Security Testing use cases: both cover DEVSECOPS, CI/CD. Key differences: Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is Commercial while Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is Free. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox
