Aikido Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vs Perisai Web Scanner: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Development teams at startups and SMBs who need SAST without the operational overhead will see immediate ROI from Aikido Static Application Security Testing; the AI-powered false positive filtering cuts the triage noise that kills adoption in resource-constrained shops, and pull request integration means developers catch issues in their workflow instead of in a separate tool. The 16-language coverage handles most polyglot codebases, and automated fix generation reduces the friction of pushing remediation back to engineers. Skip this if you're an enterprise with mature AppSec practices and heavy custom rule requirements; you'll want deeper customization and larger vendor support teams than Aikido's 187-person operation can sustain at scale. Startup development teams shipping fast need Perisai Web Scanner because it catches vulnerable dependencies and misconfigured headers in minutes without requiring infrastructure changes. The free tier covers automated scanning across JavaScript libraries and HTTP security posture, removing the cost barrier that usually delays security scanning adoption. Skip this if you're managing legacy monoliths with hundreds of interconnected services or need continuous runtime monitoring post-deployment; Perisai maps application risk at scan time, not in production.