Aikido Attack vs Filebuster: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. Filebuster is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers who need to fuzz web applications quickly without setup friction should reach for Filebuster; its speed and low barrier to entry make it ideal for engagements where you're validating input handling across dozens of endpoints in hours rather than days. The tool's free price and 219 GitHub stars indicate active maintenance and community validation of its fuzzing logic. Skip Filebuster if your scope demands sophisticated request chaining or stateful attack sequences; it's built for breadth over depth, excelling at finding the obvious parameter flaws that manual testing misses.
