Aiceberg Guardian Agent vs Enkrypt AI MCP Gateway: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aiceberg Guardian Agent

Mid-market and enterprise security teams deploying autonomous AI agents need Aiceberg Guardian Agent because it's the only tool that actually traces agent decisions back to their inputs with deterministic oversight, not just logging what happened after the fact. The millisecond-latency monitoring and patented explainable AI technology deliver the input-to-output linking that NIST DE.CM and DE.AE demand, giving you real control over LLM calls and tool execution chains before they cause damage. Skip this if your agents are simple retrieval tools or if you're still in the "let's see what happens" phase; Guardian Agent is built for teams that need to audit and justify every agent action to compliance.

Enkrypt AI MCP Gateway

Mid-market and enterprise security teams deploying agentic AI should use Enkrypt AI MCP Gateway because it's the only tool that enforces policy at the point where agents actually call external tools, not after the fact. The inline proxy architecture with pre-execution evaluation and post-execution validation covers the full request-response cycle, and multi-tenant policy scoping by role and environment means you're not rebuilding rules for each deployment. Skip this if your agents are mostly isolated from sensitive systems; the approval workflow and secrets detection add friction that only pays off when agents touch production data or privileged APIs.