Agent Monitoring vs Lasso Agentic ai security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Agent Monitoring

Mid-market and enterprise security teams deploying large language model applications need Agent Monitoring because it's the only platform that gives you real-time visibility into what your AI agents are actually doing at execution time, not just what they were supposed to do. NeuralTrust maps to four NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detect and respond, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and incident analysis through live trace correlation. Skip this if your AI workloads are still experimental or confined to a single application; the value compounds once you're managing agents across multiple LLMs and cloud platforms at scale.

Lasso Agentic ai security

Security teams deploying multi-agent AI systems need Lasso Agentic AI Security because it's the only platform that treats AI agents as a continuous attack surface, not a one-time audit problem. The autonomous red-and-blue team loop catches prompt injection and memory poisoning attacks in real time while the open-source MCP gateway gives you actual visibility into agent behavior without vendor lock-in. Skip this if your organization hasn't deployed agents yet or if you're looking for a general LLM guardrail tool; Lasso assumes you're already running AI workforces and need to defend them like infrastructure.