Adaptive Identity Proofing vs VU Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Adaptive Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing high-friction signup flows will get the most from Adaptive Identity Proofing, since its risk-based workflows let you demand proof only when signals warrant it rather than gate every user. The SignalPrint tracking system and government document verification cover PR.AA identity management rigorously, reducing both fraud and abandonment. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication or session management bundled in; Verosint is focused narrowly on the proofing moment itself.

VU Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams handling high-fraud customer onboarding will get the most from VU Security because its behavioral fraud detection actually learns per-user baseline patterns instead of applying static rules. The liveness detection during registration plus identity consolidation across multiple user profiles means you catch synthetic identities and account takeovers in the same workflow. Skip this if you need enterprise SSO across thousands of internal employees; VU Security is customer-facing CIAM, not workforce IAM, and treating it as a general access control platform will leave you frustrated.