AccuKnox Application Security vs Deepfence ThreatMapper: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AccuKnox Application Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams running Kubernetes environments need AccuKnox Application Security because its eBPF and LSM-based runtime security actually stops container breakouts in production, not just flag them in logs. The platform covers AppSec, CloudSec, and AISec in one deployment, and its zero-trust enforcement maps directly to NIST PR.PS and DE.CM without requiring separate tools. Skip this if you're primarily concerned with pre-deployment vulnerability scanning or need deep CSPM coverage; AccuKnox prioritizes runtime detection over cloud posture management.

Deepfence ThreatMapper

Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized infrastructure will get the most from Deepfence ThreatMapper because its eBPF-based observability actually surfaces exploitable vulnerabilities in running containers, not just inventories of CVEs. The ThreatGraph risk engine prioritizes findings by real attack surface, and the tool covers the full CI/CD chain from build artifacts through production Kubernetes clusters. Skip this if you need CSPM or secrets management as primary functions; ThreatMapper is built for vulnerability and malware detection in cloud-native environments, and treats compliance scanning as secondary.