689Cloud SecureDrive vs Matters External Data Risk Mgmt: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

689Cloud SecureDrive

Mid-market and enterprise teams shipping sensitive documents outside the firewall need 689Cloud SecureDrive for post-download revocation; it kills access to files already on someone's laptop, which standard cloud sharing cannot do. The platform maps cleanly to NIST PR.DS and PR.AA, with document-level tracking and role-based permissions that satisfy audit trails without requiring IT to babysit every share. Skip this if your primary concern is detecting exfiltration rather than preventing it; 689Cloud assumes the adversary already has the file and focuses on neutralizing its value instead.

Matters External Data Risk Mgmt

SMB and mid-market teams drowning in shadow AI usage will find real value in Matters External Data Risk Mgmt because it actually stops sensitive data before it leaves the device, not just after exfiltration happens. The eBPF-based process-level inspection catches data flows that traditional network DLP misses, and hybrid deployment means you're not betting everything on cloud connectivity. Skip this if your organization needs air-gapped network monitoring or already has a mature data classification taxonomy; Matters assumes you're starting from a place of chaos and wants to clamp down fast at the endpoint.