3rdRisk Platform vs Passguard: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
3rdRisk Platform is a commercial third-party risk management tool by 3rdRisk Solutions B.V.. Passguard is a commercial third-party risk management tool by Passguard. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best third-party risk management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise buyers managing vendors across multiple regulatory domains will get the most from 3rdRisk Platform because it handles security, privacy, compliance, and sustainability risks in one workspace instead of forcing separate tools per domain. The platform maps directly to NIST GV.SC and DE.CM, with continuous monitoring and real-time alerts that catch vendor incidents before they become your incident; DORA and NIS-2 compliance templates are built in rather than bolted on. Skip this if your vendor ecosystem is under 50 third parties or you need deep integrations with your existing GRC platform; 3rdRisk is strongest when you're consolidating multiple point solutions rather than supplementing an incumbent.
Security teams managing vendors with access to sensitive systems should adopt Passguard for infostealer detection that others miss: it monitors criminal marketplaces and analyzes stolen credential logs to surface compromised supplier devices before they're weaponized against you. The platform covers GV.SC supply chain risk management and DE.CM continuous monitoring under NIST CSF 2.0, with real-time alerting that lets you notify vendors while the window to contain exposure is still open. Not the right fit if your vendors lack internet-connected devices or if you need post-breach forensics; Passguard detects compromises early but doesn't replace incident response tools.
