360 Privacy 360 Monitor vs ZeroFox Dark Web Monitoring: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

360 Privacy 360 Monitor

Enterprise and mid-market security teams that need early warning of credential breaches and executive doxing threats should start with 360 Privacy 360 Monitor, since its dark web monitoring catches stolen employee credentials weeks before they appear in mainstream breach databases. The platform's continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis map directly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE functions, with real-time alerting that actually reduces the window between compromise detection and response. Skip this if your priority is incident response automation or internal asset inventory; 360 Privacy 360 Monitor is external threat intelligence first, and you'll need separate tools to act on what it finds.

ZeroFox Dark Web Monitoring

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with active credential or IP theft concerns should prioritize ZeroFox Dark Web Monitoring for its human operative intelligence collection across TOR, I2P, and messaging platforms; most competitors rely purely on automated scrapers and miss the covert forums where real damage happens. The combination of human threat actors and NLP analysis, paired with SOC-vetted alerts, means you're not drowning in noise the way you would with cheaper dark web scanners. Skip this if your organization lacks a dedicated incident response function to act on findings; the tool's value collapses without someone ready to move on remediation recommendations within hours of notification.