360 Privacy 360 Monitor vs Outpost24 CompassDRP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

360 Privacy 360 Monitor

Enterprise and mid-market security teams that need early warning of credential breaches and executive doxing threats should start with 360 Privacy 360 Monitor, since its dark web monitoring catches stolen employee credentials weeks before they appear in mainstream breach databases. The platform's continuous monitoring and adverse event analysis map directly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE functions, with real-time alerting that actually reduces the window between compromise detection and response. Skip this if your priority is incident response automation or internal asset inventory; 360 Privacy 360 Monitor is external threat intelligence first, and you'll need separate tools to act on what it finds.

Outpost24 CompassDRP

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in shadow IT and third-party risk will get real value from Outpost24 CompassDRP because it actually finds unknown internet-facing assets before attackers do, then tracks dark web exposure and compromised credentials in parallel. The 13+ years of historical threat data and automated asset scoring cut through alert fatigue by surfacing what matters first. Skip this if your organization lacks the analyst bandwidth to act on continuous discovery findings or if you need deep forensic response capabilities; CompassDRP prioritizes exposure identification over incident remediation.