xss2png vs xxeserv: 2026 Comparison
xss2png is a free penetration testing tool. xxeserv is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to quickly validate XSS vulnerabilities in client-side filtering and WAF bypasses should use xss2png. The tool embeds payloads directly into PNG metadata, bypassing input validation that flags obvious script tags; this approach catches a specific class of filter evasion that text-based payload lists miss. Skip this if your team relies on commercial proxy tools like Burp for payload generation, since xss2png solves a narrower problem and requires manual integration into your testing workflow.
Penetration testers validating XXE vulnerabilities during application assessments need xxeserv because it eliminates the friction of spinning up a full exfiltration server; the built-in FTP support handles both standard XXE payloads and file protocol variations without extra infrastructure. At 331 GitHub stars with zero dependencies, it's lightweight enough to run from a laptop during live testing. Skip this if your team needs a Swiss Army knife for multiple payload types; xxeserv is deliberately narrow, designed for XXE-specific work, not broader web exploitation frameworks.
Data verified Apr 2026
