xocopy vs Charlotte: 2026 Comparison
xocopy is a free offensive security tool. Charlotte is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red team operators and penetration testers running Unix/Linux infrastructure will find xocopy invaluable for the specific attack path it enables: executing binaries when you have write but not read permissions, a constraint that defeats most post-exploitation tooling. The technique exploits a genuine Unix permission model quirk that standard defensive controls rarely account for. Not applicable if you're defending Windows environments or need cross-platform capability; this is a narrow, deliberate Unix primitive for offensive practitioners who understand their target OS deeply.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need reliable shellcode execution without triggering EDR will find Charlotte indispensable; its C++ implementation and undetected status across major security stacks give you consistent command execution where batch scripts and PowerShell fail. The 979 GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and real-world validation from operators who depend on it. This is not for blue teams or organizations evaluating defensive tools; Charlotte is purpose-built for offense and makes no attempt to hide that.
