XFFenum vs GCPBucketBrute: 2026 Comparison
XFFenum is a free penetration testing tool. GCPBucketBrute is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers running assessments against load-balanced or proxied applications need XFFenum to catch header-injection bypasses that manual testing misses. With 94 GitHub stars and active use in red team engagements, it's proven at identifying XFF spoofing chains that expose backend servers to direct attack. Skip this if your scope doesn't include HTTP header manipulation or you're working exclusively against single-origin targets; the tool solves a specific problem rather than serving as a general enumeration framework.
Penetration testers auditing Google Cloud environments need GCPBucketBrute to quickly surface misconfigurations that automated scanners routinely miss. With 558 GitHub stars and active community use, the tool's enumeration logic catches overly permissive bucket policies faster than manual checks or generic cloud scanners. Skip this if your team lacks GCP infrastructure or needs post-exploitation privilege mapping; GCPBucketBrute is strictly a reconnaissance and access-validation tool, not a full exploitation framework.
