Weakpass vs Pentesting Payloads: 2026 Comparison
Weakpass is a free penetration testing tool. Pentesting Payloads is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers running password attack campaigns will get immediate value from Weakpass; the free wordlist collections eliminate licensing friction while covering the major hash types and complexity sizes you'll actually encounter in engagements. The tool's lack of licensing overhead means you can deploy it across multiple operator machines without procurement delays. Skip this if your team needs integrated password spraying, cracking workflow automation, or multi-protocol attack orchestration; Weakpass is wordlists only, not a cracking engine or attack framework.
Pentesters at startups and small consultancies running time-constrained assessments will move fastest with Pentesting Payloads; the web-based payload library eliminates the friction of hunting, encoding, and formatting exploits across SQLi, XSS, LFI, and command injection vectors. It's free and cloud-deployed, so there's no infrastructure lift. Skip this if you need payload generation tied to active reconnaissance data or custom encoding chains; Pentesting Payloads is a static reference tool, not an exploitation framework.
