vaf vs FuzzDB: 2026 Comparison
vaf is a free penetration testing tool. FuzzDB is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to rapidly iterate fuzzing payloads across multiple endpoints will appreciate vaf's speed and cross-platform portability; the lightweight Nim implementation outpaces Python-based fuzzers on CPU-constrained lab environments by 3-5x. With 321 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's stable enough for repeatable test runs. Skip this if you need a commercial UI, integrated reporting, or support contracts; vaf is a CLI tool for practitioners comfortable reading source code and troubleshooting their own builds.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need fast, offline fuzzing dictionaries without vendor lock-in should start with FuzzDB; its 8,848 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among practitioners who value a lightweight, freely distributable wordlist over commercial fuzz tools. The open-source attack patterns cover predictable paths, parameter names, and injection vectors that catch low-hanging misconfigurations in web apps and APIs before they reach production. Skip this if your team expects guided workflows or integrated vulnerability scanning; FuzzDB is a raw dictionary, not a full testing platform.
