Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access vs 芯盾时代 (TrusFort): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access

Security teams managing distributed workforces across multiple cloud regions should prioritize Bowtie Zero Trust Network Access for its refusal to backhaul traffic through centralized gateways, which eliminates the bottleneck that tanks performance in traditional ZTNA deployments. The distributed control plane runs entirely on your infrastructure, not Bowtie's, and WireGuard encryption keeps private keys out of vendor hands, addressing the NIST PR.AA identity and access control requirement without trust dependency. This isn't for buyers seeking integrated secure web gateway capabilities from a single vendor; Bowtie's on-device SWG component is functional but plays second fiddle to its network access core.

芯盾时代 (TrusFort)

Mid-market and enterprise teams in Asia-Pacific needing to lock down privileged access and stop lateral movement will find TrusFort's strength in identity-driven access control, particularly its PAM and dynamic access engine that enforces context-aware decisions at the API layer. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM effectively, meaning you get both strong authentication enforcement and continuous anomaly detection across your attack surface. Skip this if you're primarily hunting for advanced endpoint forensics or incident response automation; TrusFort prioritizes prevention and access governance over post-breach investigation depth.