ThreatWar Honeypot Agent vs MokN Bait: 2026 Comparison
ThreatWar Honeypot Agent is a free honeypots & deception tool. MokN Bait is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by MokN. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running lean threat intelligence operations will find value in ThreatWar Honeypot Agent because it removes infrastructure overhead; you get a managed honeypot without standing up your own backend, which matters when you're resource-constrained. The free model and 39 GitHub stars suggest early adoption from practitioners willing to trade polish for simplicity. Skip this if you need deep honeypot customization, multi-tenancy, or integration with enterprise SIEM platforms; it's built for teams that want to deploy fast and tolerate some rough edges.
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in credential stuffing and password spray attacks need MokN Bait because it stops attackers at the moment they try stolen passwords, not weeks later in logs. Cloud deployment means no infrastructure work, and the zero false positive guarantee matters when your SOC is already understaffed; you get signal instead of noise. Skip this if your threat model is primarily external perimeter attacks rather than post-breach lateral movement, or if your team lacks basic credential hygiene to make decoy baits credible.
