ThreatBook Digital Risk Protection Service (DRPS) vs ZeroFox: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ThreatBook Digital Risk Protection Service (DRPS)

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing and impersonation attacks will see immediate value in ThreatBook Digital Risk Protection Service because its managed takedown service actually removes threats instead of just alerting you to them, with average 48-hour takedown times across phishing sites, rogue apps, and fake accounts. The service's coverage across websites, social media, app stores, and dark web, paired with 24/7 real-time monitoring, explains why it maps cleanly to NIST DE.AE and RS.MA functions; you get detection and incident management from a single vendor. Skip this if you need post-incident forensics and recovery support built into the platform itself; ThreatBook prioritizes takedown speed over deep investigation workflows.

ZeroFox

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing brand, executive, and data exposure across open and dark web channels should pick ZeroFox for its automated takedown operations and 24/7 managed SOC that actually closes the response gap most external threat tools create. The platform covers ID.AM through RS.AN in NIST CSF 2.0, meaning it moves past detection into investigation and remediation; the managed takedown service across multiple platforms is the concrete differentiator here. Skip this if your organization needs deep integration with existing SOAR workflows or prefers full self-service over managed services; ZeroFox's value comes from outsourcing triage and enforcement, not from becoming another data source in your ticketing system.