Qmulos Q-Core vs Thoropass Access Reviews: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Qmulos Q-Core

Mid-market and enterprise compliance teams buried in control evidence across multiple frameworks will move fastest with Q-Core's centralized repository and OSCAL-formatted SSP generation, which cuts the manual document assembly that kills authorization timelines. The POA&M dashboard and integrated ticketing system keep remediation from disappearing into Slack threads, and multi-framework support means you're not rebuilding the wheel for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP in parallel. Skip this if you need deep threat modeling or continuous control monitoring; Q-Core is built for evidence collection and authorization workflows, not real-time detection and response.

Thoropass Access Reviews

Compliance teams running quarterly or continuous access reviews across multiple frameworks will eliminate weeks of manual evidence gathering with Thoropass Access Reviews. The tool automates the collection and storage of access justifications tied to specific audit scopes, cutting the busywork that typically delays certification cycles. Skip this if your access control decisions are already locked down and your audit schedule is driven by a single framework; Thoropass shines when you're juggling SOC 2, ISO 27001, and internal policy simultaneously across a distributed infrastructure.