Palo Alto Networks Medical Device Security vs TCPWave: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Palo Alto Networks Medical Device Security

Mid-market and enterprise healthcare organizations need visibility into unmanaged medical devices before they can secure them, and Palo Alto Networks Medical Device Security excels at discovery and risk prioritization where most NAC tools fail. The platform covers asset identification, vulnerability ranking, and virtual patching without requiring device reimaging, which matters in clinical environments where downtime is measured in patient harm. Skip this if your inventory consists entirely of managed endpoints; the value proposition collapses when devices are already enrolled in standard MDM or inventory systems.

TCPWave

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid cloud infrastructure will benefit most from TCPWave for its AI-assisted IP address and DNS management, which reduces manual configuration errors that create network access vulnerabilities. The platform's coverage across ID.AM asset management and DE.CM continuous monitoring, combined with native Microsoft DNS/DHCP integration, means you're not bolting together separate tools for DDI visibility. Skip this if you need WAF or load balancing as primary functions; those features exist here but feel secondary to the DDI core, and dedicated ADC vendors will outpace TCPWave on those fronts.