DerSecur Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vs Tanium SBOM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

DerSecur Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing sprawling open-source dependencies will get immediate value from DerSecur SCA because its hybrid reachability analysis cuts false positives by actually proving whether a vulnerable component is callable from your code, not just present in your tree. The PURL-based package naming and automated SBOM generation cover NIST GV.SC and ID.AM controls that auditors will ask for, and integrations with GitHub and NVD keep findings current without manual feeds. Skip this if your primary need is license compliance depth or you're a small team still building basic dependency visibility; DerSecur assumes you've already mapped your supply chain risk and need to prioritize what actually matters to remediate.

Tanium SBOM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing distributed endpoints will get immediate value from Tanium SBOM's runtime visibility into open-source vulnerabilities across your entire fleet, not just what your build pipeline knows about. The tool maps actual software in use at the endpoint level and catches zero-day threats like Log4j within your live environment, which most SCA tools miss because they stop at the repository. Skip this if you need deep code-level scanning or developer-first remediation workflows; Tanium is built for defenders who need to know what's actually running and what to patch first, not for teams optimizing CI/CD gate security.