ssh-auth-logger vs Syrup: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ssh-auth-logger is a free honeypots & deception tool. Syrup is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running flat networks or isolated honeypot segments will get real value from ssh-auth-logger for one reason: it logs every SSH authentication attempt in structured JSON, making it trivial to pipe into your existing SIEM without custom parsing. Free pricing and a 26-star GitHub footprint mean minimal friction to deploy a decoy SSH server alongside production infrastructure. Skip this if you need honeypot management at scale or cross-protocol deception; ssh-auth-logger does SSH authentication logging and nothing else.
Security teams running exposed SSH infrastructure who want to see what attackers actually do once they breach credentials will find Syrup's session recording and fake shell interactions invaluable for threat intelligence; the Go implementation keeps deployment lightweight on commodity hardware. Its 99 GitHub stars and free pricing make it a low-friction addition to existing detection workflows, though it prioritizes observation over blocking, so pair it with network controls if you're treating SSH as a critical perimeter. Skip Syrup if you need production-grade SSH access management or NIST Respond capabilities; it's purely about understanding attacker behavior after the fact.
