Static File Analyzer (SFA) vs yextend: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Static File Analyzer (SFA) is a free detection engineering tool. yextend is a free detection engineering tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best detection engineering fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Incident responders and malware analysts working with limited budgets will find Static File Analyzer most useful for rapid file triage when ClamAV and YARA signatures are sufficient for your threat model. The visual tree graphs and scoring system accelerate pattern extraction during investigation, and the free pricing removes procurement friction for lean teams. Skip this if your environment demands proprietary threat intelligence, machine learning-based detection, or integration with commercial sandbox platforms; SFA's strength is file-level analysis, not behavioral detonation.
Incident responders and malware analysts who spend time manually unpacking nested archives will cut analysis time significantly with yextend; it automates the inflation of compressed and archived payloads so Yara rules match patterns buried across multiple layers without manual extraction. The tool is free and carries 322 GitHub stars from active DFIR practitioners, indicating real adoption in triage workflows. Skip this if you need a full-featured forensics platform with reporting and case management; yextend is deliberately narrow, solving one problem exceptionally well for teams already using Yara as their matching engine.
