sshd-honeypot vs Troje: 2026 Comparison
sshd-honeypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Troje is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running Linux infrastructure who want to observe actual attacker behavior on exposed SSH ports should deploy sshd-honeypot; it intercepts brute force attempts and shell commands in real time without the overhead of full Cowrie instances. The setup is straightforward,a modified OpenSSH daemon that logs to Cowrie,and costs nothing, making it practical for teams that need threat intelligence on SSH reconnaissance patterns. Skip this if you need centralized log aggregation, alerting, or forensics across multiple honeypots; sshd-honeypot is a thin instrumentation layer, not a management platform.
Security teams experimenting with active defense or running small-to-medium detection labs will find Troje valuable for honeypot deployment without licensing friction; the free model and LXC container foundation mean you can spin up deceptive environments quickly and capture attacker behavior at scale. The dynamic container approach gives you flexibility that static honeypots lack, letting you adapt bait and monitoring rules between deployments. Skip this if you need integration with your existing SIEM or require managed threat feeds; Troje is a focused detection tool, not an orchestration platform, and the 45 GitHub stars suggest limited community momentum for production hardening.
