sandmap vs sqliv: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
sandmap is a free security scanning tool. sqliv is a free security scanning tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security scanning fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Network defenders who need fast, flexible reconnaissance without vendor lock-in should reach for sandmap; it bundles 459 scan profiles into a single CLI tool that cuts the learning curve for both nmap newcomers and veterans customizing advanced reconnaissance. The 31 native modules and 1,723 GitHub stars signal active community refinement of what would otherwise be tedious multi-tool orchestration. Skip this if your team lacks CLI fluency or needs a GUI-first experience; sandmap is purpose-built for practitioners who think in commands, not dashboards.
Developers and AppSec teams doing manual penetration testing or code review will find sqliv most useful for its speed; it scans large codebases for SQL injection vectors faster than typing manual payloads, and the 1,220 GitHub stars suggest real adoption among practitioners who need quick validation. The free pricing means zero friction to test it against your codebase today. Skip this if you need continuous scanning integrated into your CI/CD pipeline or a platform that covers the full vulnerability lifecycle; sqliv is a point tool for finding the vulnerability, not managing remediation at scale.
