SprayingToolkit vs LinksDumper: 2026 Comparison
SprayingToolkit is a free offensive security tool. LinksDumper is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers targeting Microsoft environments need SprayingToolkit for its purpose-built attack chains against Lync, Skype for Business, and OWA; the modular design of Atomizer, Vaporizer, Aerosol, and Spindrift lets you chain attacks without rebuilding payloads between targets. The 1,557 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect real adoption in assessments where off-the-shelf commercial tools either overkill the scope or lack the flexibility to handle hybrid authentication stacks. Skip this if you're looking for a polished UI or post-exploitation frameworks; SprayingToolkit is Python scripts, nothing more, and demands you understand what each tool does before running it.
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters doing manual web reconnaissance will find LinksDumper useful for fast endpoint extraction from HTTP responses, especially when working across multiple targets where manual link cataloging creates bottlenecks. The tool's 91 GitHub stars and free pricing reflect its adoption in the offensive security community where speed and zero cost matter more than UI polish. Skip this if you need automated crawling, JavaScript execution, or integration with larger scanning platforms; LinksDumper is deliberately minimal and CLI-first, extracting what's already in the response rather than discovering new endpoints through interaction.
