SpamHole.net vs StrutsHoneypot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
SpamHole.net is a free honeypots & deception tool. StrutsHoneypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running their own mail infrastructure who need to actively identify and block spammer IPs will find SpamHole.net valuable; it collects spam targeting your domain, automatically logs sender IPs, and feeds data directly into blacklists without the overhead of commercial threat intelligence services. The free pricing means you're only investing engineer time to deploy and monitor the honeypot, making it practical even for resource-constrained teams. Skip this if you're looking for enterprise-scale email filtering or expect managed threat feeds; SpamHole is a DIY tool that works best when you're willing to integrate the IP data into your own firewall or mail gateway rules.
Teams running legacy Java applications still exposed to Struts CVE-2017-5638 should deploy StrutsHoneypot as a low-friction detection layer; it's free, requires minimal setup on Apache 2 infrastructure, and gives you concrete proof of exploitation attempts before they hit your application layer. The 72 GitHub stars and active exploitation history of this CVE make it worth the single-purpose overhead. Skip this if you need a multi-CVE honeypot or are already running intrusion detection that catches OGNL injection patterns; StrutsHoneypot wins only if you have unpatched Struts instances you can't immediately retire.
