Fortra ZTNA vs Soliton Systems G/On: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN will find Fortra ZTNA's strongest value in its hybrid deployment flexibility and granular access controls that actually enforce least-privilege without admin headaches. The platform covers all four critical NIST CSF 2.0 areas for identity and continuous monitoring, which matters because most ZTNA products punt on asset inventory or detection tuning. Skip this if your org needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or runs exclusively on-prem; Fortra's strength is in hybrid environments where cloud and datacenter access requirements overlap. Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN with zero-trust remote access will find G/On's USB-key client the least disruptive path; no installation means adoption friction drops on unmanaged devices, and the portable form factor solves the "what if I switch laptops" problem that software-only SDP solutions create. Three NIST CSF 2.0 coverage areas including PR.AA and continuous monitoring reflect legitimate identity and access control enforcement. Skip this if your workforce needs clientless browser-based access or your risk model demands agent-based endpoint telemetry; G/On prioritizes network segmentation over visibility into device posture.

Based on our analysis of core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion: