Skyhook vs WebDAV Covert Channel: 2026 Comparison
Skyhook is a free offensive security tool. WebDAV Covert Channel is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running command-and-control operations will find Skyhook's HTTP obfuscation valuable for exfiltrating data past signature-based network detection without burning commercial C2 frameworks. The tool is free and actively maintained on GitHub with 275 stars, lowering the barrier for teams testing IDS evasion in controlled environments. Skip this if you need stealth against behavioral analytics or YARA-based file inspection; Skyhook prioritizes IDS evasion specifically, leaving you exposed to detection layers that watch for anomalous transfer patterns rather than known signatures.
Red team operators and penetration testers validating WebDAV weaknesses in their own infrastructure will find WebDAV Covert Channel valuable for demonstrating C2 evasion tactics that slip past signature-based detection. The tool's use of native WebDAV protocol features means it generates legitimate-looking traffic patterns that most organizations haven't specifically instrumented to catch, making it effective for stress-testing detection gaps in NIST Detect capabilities. Skip this if your goal is operational C2 for live engagements; it's a lab tool for controlled assessment, not a field weapon, and requires explicit network access to WebDAV services most enterprises have already disabled.
