Fortra ZTNA vs Skyhigh Security Private Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN will find Fortra ZTNA's strongest value in its hybrid deployment flexibility and granular access controls that actually enforce least-privilege without admin headaches. The platform covers all four critical NIST CSF 2.0 areas for identity and continuous monitoring, which matters because most ZTNA products punt on asset inventory or detection tuning. Skip this if your org needs deep integration with legacy on-premises identity systems or runs exclusively on-prem; Fortra's strength is in hybrid environments where cloud and datacenter access requirements overlap. Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN with zero trust will value Skyhigh Security Private Access for its native data loss prevention scanning, which catches exfiltration attempts inside the access tunnel rather than after. The tool scores across PR.AA (identity and access control), PR.DS (data security), and DE.CM (continuous monitoring), meaning it enforces least privilege while simultaneously inspecting what's moving through authenticated sessions. Skip this if your priority is RBI-first access; Skyhigh integrates remote browser isolation as an add-on, not a core architecture, so teams needing sandboxed browsing as the default should look elsewhere.

Based on our analysis of core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion: