Myra Application Security vs SiteLock Pro: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Myra Application Security

Mid-market and enterprise teams defending APIs and web applications against sophisticated DDoS and bot traffic will find Myra Application Security's Layer 7 protection genuinely useful, particularly if you operate in Europe and need GDPR-compliant traffic filtering without the compliance overhead of US-based WAF vendors. The vendor's EU data residency and GDPR-native bot protection (no third-party CAPTCHA dependencies) removes a friction point most teams face when selecting WAF providers. Skip this if your primary concern is post-breach forensics or endpoint detection; Myra prioritizes prevention and continuous monitoring over incident response capabilities.

SiteLock Pro

SMBs and mid-market teams without dedicated security staff should pick SiteLock Pro for its automated malware scanning and one-click WordPress patching, which eliminate the manual work of staying ahead of common vulnerabilities. The platform covers four critical NIST functions,Platform Security, Infrastructure Resilience, Continuous Monitoring, and Risk Assessment,reflecting a breadth that handles both prevention and detection simultaneously. Skip this if you need granular WAF tuning or run non-WordPress CMS platforms; SiteLock's automation works best for teams that want security to run in the background.