Silverfort Universal Multi-factor authentication vs GateKeeper Enterprise: 2026 Comparison

Silverfort Universal Multi-factor authentication

Organizations protecting legacy applications and OT systems should pick Silverfort Universal Multi-factor authentication because it enforces MFA without code changes or agent deployment, a constraint that kills most competitors in these environments. The agentless architecture extends MFA to Kerberos, NTLM, LDAP, and command-line tools that modern solutions simply skip over, backed by risk-based enforcement tied to real-time threat signals for adaptive policy. Skip this if your infrastructure is cloud-native and you need MFA as one layer of a broader identity platform; Silverfort is deliberately built for the hard authentication problems that on-premises environments create.

GateKeeper Enterprise

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting shared or high-touch workstations should consider GateKeeper Enterprise for its proximity-based automatic lock-unlock, which eliminates the friction of manual MFA while maintaining audit trails on who accessed what. The on-premises deployment with SQL-backed credential storage and Active Directory integration appeals to organizations with strict data residency requirements, and the NIST PR.AA coverage reflects solid identity and access control enforcement. This is not the right choice if you need cloud-native SSO, browser extension support across all applications, or cloud-hosted credential management; GateKeeper's strength is physical workstation security for defined user populations, not distributed workforce scenarios.