Mitek MiVIP vs Signicat Identity Proofing: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Mitek MiVIP

Mid-market and enterprise teams building passwordless authentication into onboarding workflows should evaluate MiVIP for its layered deepfake and document-forgery detection; the AI-driven fraud detection handles template injection and AI-altered documents that rule-based systems routinely miss. The platform covers KYC, AML screening, and biometric auth through a single API, which cuts integration lift versus stitching three vendors together. Skip this if your priority is post-authentication access control; MiVIP owns identity verification and onboarding, not runtime permission management.

Signicat Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise fintechs moving fast on regulated onboarding will appreciate Signicat Identity Proofing because it handles 35+ identity methods across geographies without forcing you to stitch together five different vendors. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA (identity management) and GV.SC (supply chain risk) requirements out of the box, and the video-based biometric verification actually works across borderless customer bases where traditional document-only checks fail. This isn't the tool for companies that need identity verification as a bolt-on to a larger IAM platform; Signicat is purpose-built for KYC/AML compliance workflows, which means you're either solving that problem or you're overpaying.