Adaptive Identity Proofing vs Mitek MiVIP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Adaptive Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing high-friction signup flows will get the most from Adaptive Identity Proofing, since its risk-based workflows let you demand proof only when signals warrant it rather than gate every user. The SignalPrint tracking system and government document verification cover PR.AA identity management rigorously, reducing both fraud and abandonment. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication or session management bundled in; Verosint is focused narrowly on the proofing moment itself.

Mitek MiVIP

Mid-market and enterprise teams building passwordless authentication into onboarding workflows should evaluate MiVIP for its layered deepfake and document-forgery detection; the AI-driven fraud detection handles template injection and AI-altered documents that rule-based systems routinely miss. The platform covers KYC, AML screening, and biometric auth through a single API, which cuts integration lift versus stitching three vendors together. Skip this if your priority is post-authentication access control; MiVIP owns identity verification and onboarding, not runtime permission management.